

IN THE NEWS
Science doesn’t have last word
ALBANY DEMOCRAT-HERALD
If the flap over the latest logging study in the Biscuit Fire shows anything, it’s that science doesn’t have all the answers, at least not in the short term.
The flap began with the publication in Science of a paper by OSU graduate student D.C. Donato and others titled “Post-wildfire logging hinders regeneration and increases fire risk.”
SEE FULL STORY >>
|


IN THE NEWS
Logging study sets off own firestorm
MICHAEL MILSTEIN, PORTLAND OREGONIAN
A contingent of professors at Oregon State University's College of Forestry want the nation's top scientific journal to withhold a study by an OSU graduate student who found that forests best recover from wildfires when they are not logged and left alone.
Donald Kennedy, the top editor of the journal Science, said there is no chance the research will be suppressed.
"They're trying to rewind history," said Kennedy.
SEE FULL STORY >>
|


IN THE NEWS
Salvage logging supporters say OSU report won't change debate
DAN BERMAN, E&E DAILY
Doug Crandall, staff director of the House Forests Subcommittee, disagreed with the findings of the OSU report as well but acknowledged the public has a difficult time trying to sift through the science and report on the issue. "It's always our scientists versus your scientists, it makes it really difficult for the public to sort through all that," Crandall said.
SEE FULL STORY >>
|




IN THE NEWS
'Sooner rather than later' on forest recovery, salvage
DAN BERMAN, E&E DAILY
Introduced last fall, H.R. 4200 from Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) and cosponsor Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.) has drawn significant opposition from environmentalists who say it is an excuse to promote salvage logging on national forests.
"I know the opponents of the bill want to say it's a chainsaw massacre," Walden said, contending that H.R. 4200 does not mandate salvage logging as the primary course or action.
SEE FULL STORY >>
|


IN THE NEWS
OSU dean apologizes for logging study fracas
GREENWIRE
Oregon State University's College of Forestry dean said last week he regretted the conflict between some of his faculty and a graduate student who published a study contradicting their findings.
"I profoundly regret the negative debate that recent events have generated," Salwasser wrote in a letter to the college. "Few faculty, let alone graduate students, get their work published in this prestigious journal."
SEE FULL STORY >>
|


IN THE NEWS
No end in sight—OSU prof will press research challenge
BY MICHAEL MILSTEIN, PORTLAND OREGONIAN
John Sessions said that he regrets the fallout facing Salwasser, but still feels strongly that the research by Donato and five other OSU and U.S. Forest Service scientists has serious flaws.
He described its publication as a failure of the peer review process, a central pillar of research by which independent scientists review findings for weaknesses.
SEE FULL STORY >>
|


IN THE NEWS
BLM pulls funding for OSU logging study
GREENWIRE
The Bureau of Land Management said yesterday it has suspended funding for an Oregon State University graduate student's study that refuted the benefits of post-fire logging in Science.
BLM officials said the study, headed by graduate student Daniel Donato, violated a provision of its $300,000 research grant stipulating that it cannot be used to lobby Congress and must consult a BLM scientist before publishing.
SEE FULL STORY >>
|


IN THE NEWS
House Democrat seeks investigation of pulled funding
DAN BERMAN, GREENWIRE
"I'm concerned that in this case funding may have been frozen to punish researchers for reporting findings that are unpopular with the administration," Rep. Jay Inslee said in a letter to Interior Department Inspector General Earl Devaney. "Please immediately investigate whether Daniel Donato and his research team lost funding without cause or were treated more harshly than other federal research grant recipients."
SEE FULL STORY >>
|


IN THE NEWS
About-face restores OSU study money
BY MICHAEL MILSTEIN, PORTLAND OREGONIAN
The federal government on Wednesday swiftly restored funding for an Oregon State University study of logging in burned forests after lawmakers said a freeze of the money could leave "the impression of scientific censorship."
The move came hours after OSU asked the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to reinstate the funding.
SEE FULL STORY >>
|



|

|

|
SALVAGE LOGGING HISTORY
This report also found that "there is little reason to believe that
post-fire salvage logging has any positive ecological benefits...there is
considerable evidence that persistent, significant adverse enviornmental
impacts are likely to result from salvage logging."

DOWNLOAD BESCHTA REPORT >>
|

|

|

|

|

|

|